STARLING et al v. RECALDE et al
| LORRAINE STARLING |
| OSWALDO RECALDE, COWAN SYSTEMS, LLC, MICHIKO WILLIAMS, ABC CORPS 1-10 and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv20614 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| Esther Salas |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (ek) |
Filing 4
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 3/22/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 1/12/2022. (seb)
|
| Filing 3 Defendant Oswaldo Recalde's ANSWER to Complaint by OSWALDO RECALDE.(CLARK, DELIA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COWAN SYSTEMS LLC., OSWALDO RECALDE. (CLARK, DELIA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COWAN SYSTEMS LLC., OSWALDO RECALDE from Superior Court of New Jersey - Essex County, case number ESX-L-005497. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13057321), filed by COWAN SYSTEMS LLC., OSWALDO RECALDE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C)(CLARK, DELIA) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
