ROSADO v. DICKSON et al
| Jameson Rosado |
| JOSEPH A. DICKSON, DR. MIKE KELLY, E. Stentella and Jerry Sanseberio |
| 2:2022cv01274 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING #1 Application to Proceed IFP and that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is afforded (30) days to file an Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies noted herein. Failure to file an Amended Complaint within this time will result in the entire case being dismissed and closed. Plaintiff's Motions #6 and #7 are DENIED. etc. (n.m.). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 5/5/2022. (jd)
|
|
COMPLAINT filed see D.E. #2 .(jd) Modified on 5/6/2022 (jd,).
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION for an in person status conference. Motion set for 6/6/2022 before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jd)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for in person status conference by JAMESON ROSADO. (jd)
|
|
Filing 6
Supplemental STATEMENT regarding Change of Venue Motion Request by Plaintiff, from JAMESON ROSADO. (wh)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, )
|
|
Filing 5
Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01691. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/2/22) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Jameson Rosado consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Jameson Rosado..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Joseph A. Dickson, Mike Kelly, Jerry Sanseberio, E. Stentella. Document filed by Jameson Rosado..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jameson Rosado..(rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
