CLI INTERACTIVE, LLC v. DIAMOND PHIL'S, LLC
| CLI INTERACTIVE, LLC. |
| DIAMOND PHIL'S, LLC. |
| 2:2022cv01602 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RESPONSE in Opposition filed by CLI INTERACTIVE, LLC. re #3 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Envelope, #4 Envelope)(sm)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 5/16/2022 before Judge Julien Xavier Neals. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: The Court will hold an initial conference (rule 16) before U.S.M.J. C. Waldor by telephone on 6/1/22 at 10am. Plaintiff shall initiate the call and local counsel for any/all parties must participate. Parties are to submit a completed Pretrial Scheduling Order (for Judge Salas cases, please use her dedicated PTSO found in the same location) found in the Notice of Judicial Preferences link to chambers via email at CLW_Orders@njd.uscourts.gov no later than 3 days before the scheduled conference.. Please contact chambers with any questions or concerns at (973) 776 7862. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 4/22/22. (tjg, )
|
|
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tjg, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by DIAMOND PHIL'S, LLC.. Responses due by 5/2/2022 (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in support of Dismissal, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of service, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Exhibit Complaint)(WILSON, BRADLEY)
|
|
Filing 2
AO121 Copyright Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (sm)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diamond Phil's et al from Sussex Superior Court, case number L-000059-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13273629), filed by Diamond Phil's et al. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff amended complaint, #2 Supplement)(WILSON, BRADLEY)
|
|
Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CLI INTERACTIVE, LLC v. DIAMOND PHIL'S, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CLI INTERACTIVE, LLC. | |
| Represented By: | STEPHEN ATTEMA GRAVATT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DIAMOND PHIL'S, LLC. | |
| Represented By: | BRADLEY M. WILSON |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
