KIM v. RIDGEFIELD et al
SARAH H. KIM and H. SARAH KIM |
BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ, RUSSELL CASTELLI, HUGO JIMENEZ, JAMES KONTOLIOS, LAUREN LARKIN, STEPHEN F. PELLINO, RAY RAMIREZ, XYZ CORP. INC. (1-10) and JANE DOES (1-10) |
2:2022cv01680 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Andre M Espinosa |
William J Martini |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RUSSELL CASTELLI, HUGO JIMENEZ, JAMES KONTOLIOS, LAUREN LARKIN, STEPHEN F. PELLINO, RAY RAMIREZ, BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ANTHONY R SUAREZ. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs March 25, 2022 letter requesting that the Court amend the filing date of her Complaint due to technical difficulties. The Court is unable to grant the requested relief and Plaintiffs request is therefore denied. So Ordered by Judge William J. Martini on 3/30/22. (gh, ) |
Filing 2 Letter from Plaintiff. (KIM, H SARAH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALL DEFENDANTS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13283456) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SARAH H. KIM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KIM, H SARAH) |
Case Reassigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.