ECUADORIAN RAINFOREST, LLC v. TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
| ECUADORIAN RAINFOREST, LLC |
| TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. |
| 2:2022cv01856 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 5/19/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: With the consent of the parties, the motion to dismiss (ECF No. #6 ) is set for June 20, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 5/19/2022. (sms)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel: R16 Scheduling Conference held on 5/19/2022. (sms)
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion reset for 6/20/2022 before Judge Katharine S. Hayden. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms)
|
|
Filing 11
Joint Discovery Plan by ECUADORIAN RAINFOREST, LLC.(BUEHLER, RYAN)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER ORDER granting the #9 Plaintiff's Request for an additional one-cycle adjournment of the Motion. etc. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 4/29/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 6/6/2022 before Judge Katharine S. Hayden. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 9
Letter re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. (BUEHLER, RYAN)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting the #7 Letter Rule 7.1 Request. The new motion return date is May 16, 2022. etc. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 4/13/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 7
Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint . (BUEHLER, RYAN)
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 5/16/2022 before Judge Katharine S. Hayden. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.. Responses due by 4/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(MARTIN, THOMAS)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion set for 5/2/2022 before Judge Katharine S. Hayden. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER: A telephonic initial scheduling conference shall be held on May 19, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The dial in number is 1-888-684-8852 and the access code is 310-0383#. The parties shall file a proposed Joint Discovery Plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form Joint Discovery Plan can be found # here. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 4/7/2022. (sms)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM D. BIERMAN on behalf of TFORCE FREIGHT INC. (BIERMAN, WILLIAM)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by TFORCE FREIGHT INC.. (MARTIN, THOMAS)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS C. MARTIN on behalf of TFORCE FREIGHT INC. (MARTIN, THOMAS)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TFORCE FREIGHT INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Passaic County, case number PAS-L-546-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number BNJDC-13302706), filed by TFORCE FREIGHT INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MARTIN, THOMAS)
|
|
Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ECUADORIAN RAINFOREST, LLC v. TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ECUADORIAN RAINFOREST, LLC | |
| Represented By: | RYAN MICHAEL BUEHLER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM D. BIERMAN |
| Represented By: | THOMAS C. MARTIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
