INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC v. SMFB, LLC
INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC |
SMFB, LLC |
2:2022cv01921 |
April 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Kevin McNulty |
Cathy L Waldor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Entry of Default against SMFB Labs, LLC. Motion set for 6/6/2022 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Entry of Default against SMFB Labs, LLC by INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Owen A. Kloter, Esq. in Support of Entry of Default, #2 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Service of Complaint 4-7-22)(KLOTER, OWEN) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC identifying RMM Innovations as Corporate Parent.. (KLOTER, OWEN) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC. SMFB, LLC served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. (KLOTER, OWEN) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (dam, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SMFB, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (jr) |
Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC as to SMFB, LLC. (KLOTER, OWEN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SMFB, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13309541) with JURY DEMAND, filed by INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 12/16/2020 Invoice, #2 Exhibit 3/31/2021 Invoice, #3 Exhibit 5/7/2021 Invoice, #4 Exhibit 5/21/2021 Invoice, #5 Exhibit 7/9/2021 Invoice, #6 Exhibit 7/12/2021 Invoice, #7 Exhibit 8/11/2021 Invoice, #8 Exhibit 8/13/2021 Invoice, #9 Exhibit 10/8/2021 Invoice, #10 Exhibit 11/2/2021 Invoice, #11 Exhibit 12/1/2021 Invoice, #12 Exhibit 12/6/2021 Invoice, #13 Exhibit 12/16/2021 Invoice, #14 Exhibit 1/11/2022 Invoice, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(KLOTER, OWEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC v. SMFB, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: INNOVATIVE COSMETIC CONCEPTS, LLC | |
Represented By: | OWEN ANDREW KLOTER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SMFB, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.