CAKIR v. USCIS et al
| VEDAT CAKIR |
| USCIS, UR M. JADDOU, MR JOHN E. THOMPSON and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
| 2:2022cv02145 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MARGARET ANN MAHONEY on behalf of All Defendants (MAHONEY, MARGARET) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (MAHONEY, MARGARET) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by USCIS has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/1/2022. (lag, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, JOHN E. THOMPSON, USCIS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13333512), filed by VEDAT CAKIR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons For USCIS, #3 Summons For UR M. JADDOU, #4 Summons For JOHN E. THOMPSON, #5 Summons For ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS)(BAYRAM, AARON) |
| Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
