SPEER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
JOSEPH D SPEER and SIA HU |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOHN F. KELLY and JAMES MCCAMENT |
2:2022cv02201 |
April 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Kevin McNulty |
Cathy L Waldor |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JOHN F. KELLY, JAMES MCCAMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by JOSEPH D SPEER, SIA HU as to JAMES MCCAMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. (CHO, JAE) |
Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by JOSEPH D SPEER, SIA HU as to JOHN F. KELLY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (CHO, JAE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN F. KELLY, JAMES MCCAMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13338814), filed by JOSEPH D SPEER, SIA HU. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CHO, JAE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.