GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC et al
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO CASUALTY CO. |
HEALTH MEDICAL REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C., NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC, JORGE MENDEZ, M.D., PASQUALE PUCCIARELLI, D.C., FREDERICK GANGEMI, M.D., HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C., MARK ZABLOW, D.C. and STEVEN SALBERG, D.C. |
2:2022cv02481 |
April 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Andre M Espinosa |
Julien Xavier Neals |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO CASUALTY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. identifying Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (KANG, GENE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FREDERICK GANGEMI, M.D., HEALTH MEDICAL REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C., JORGE MENDEZ, M.D., NJ INSTITUTE FOR SPINE AND JOINT PAIN, PC, PASQUALE PUCCIARELLI, D.C., STEVEN SALBERG, D.C., MARK ZABLOW, D.C. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13371909) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO., GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1", #2 Exhibit "2", #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KANG, GENE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.