FAHRION v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| DONNA FAHRION |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 2:2022cv02503 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Norah McCann King (OHSD) |
| Susan D Wigenton |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Letter request for an extension of time to file Plaintiff's primary contentions by 8/1/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King (OHSD) on 6/24/2022. (DS, )
|
| Filing 9 Letter from Sheryl Gandel Mazur Requesting an Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Contentions. (MAZUR, SHERYL) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: It is ordered that the Plaintiff's Statement of Primary Contentions or Arguments for Relief due 7/1/2022; Responses due by 8/1/2022; Plaintiff's Brief due by 8/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 6/21/2022.(DS, )
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King (OHSD) for all further proceedings. Judge Susan D. Wigenton no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/21/2022. (DS, )
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by DONNA FAHRION. (MAZUR, SHERYL) |
| Filing 5 Administrative Record Filed - Social Security (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11)(FRITTS, HEATHER) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by HEATHER TASHMAN FRITTS on behalf of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (FRITTS, HEATHER) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED and Electronically Served via ECF pursuant to #Standing Order 2021-09 as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY within 60 days of the date of this entry The Commissioner of Social Security shall file and serve either a dispositive motion or the Certified Administrative Record Pursuant to Local Civ. R. 9.1 (c) (ams, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 -2 Application IFP; The Clerk shall file the Complaint. etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 5/4/2022. (ams, )
|
| COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by DONNA FAHRION (See D.E. #1 ). (ams, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP)(MAZUR, SHERYL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/2/2022: #3 Text of Proposed Order) (ams, ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FAHRION v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DONNA FAHRION | |
| Represented By: | SHERYL GANDEL MAZUR |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | HEATHER TASHMAN FRITTS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
