EARLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: THOMAS EARLEY and THOMAS E. EARLEY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 2:2022cv02514
Filed: April 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King (OHSD)
Referring Judge: Julien Xavier Neals
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: It is ordered that the Plaintiff's statement of primary contentions or argument for relief due by 7/5/2022; Defendant's response due by 8/4/2022; Plaintiff's brief due by 9/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 6/22/2022. (DS, )
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King (OHSD) for all further proceedings. Judge Julien Xavier Neals no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/22/2022. (DS, )
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by THOMAS E. EARLEY. (MAZUR, SHERYL)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Administrative Record Filed - Social Security (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17)(BENDERSON, HEATHER)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by HEATHER ANNE BENDERSON on behalf of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (BENDERSON, HEATHER)
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED and Electronically Served via ECF pursuant to #Standing Order 2021-09 as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY within 60 days of the date of this entry The Commissioner of Social Security shall file and serve either a dispositive motion or the Certified Administrative Record Pursuant to Local Civ. R. 9.1 (c) (jd)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13373765), filed by THOMAS EARLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAZUR, SHERYL)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals. (ak, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EARLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS EARLEY
Represented By: SHERYL GANDEL MAZUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS E. EARLEY
Represented By: SHERYL GANDEL MAZUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Represented By: HEATHER ANNE BENDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?