SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC v. ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP et al
| SILVER ARCH CAPTIAL PARTNERS, LLC and SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC. |
| ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION and TIG ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP |
| 2:2022cv02756 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Edward S Kiel |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL without Prejudice against Defendant Romspen Investment Corporation only. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 7/7/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 23
BRIEF in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs re #21 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - B)(RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Romspen Investment Corporation by SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC. (RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #21 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 7/18/2022 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Dismiss by ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 20
Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP. (LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 19
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP.(LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting the #11 Motion for the pro hac vice admission of Hartley T. Bernstein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 6/21/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 17
Letter from Leo V. Leyva, Esq. Withdrawing Letter Filed re #16 Letter. (LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 16
Letter from Leo V. Leyva, Esq. in Response re #15 Letter. (LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 15
Letter re 13 Order,,. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Revised proposed Order)(RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 6/9/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER: As to the "motion for leave to appear pro hac vice" (ECF No. #11 ), the applicant fails to indicate if all parties have consented to the motion. The applicant is ordered to file supplemental papers by Tuesday, June 14, 2022 that accord with Local Civil Rule 101.1(c) and paragraph 5 of the Court's # Civil Case Management Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 6/9/2022. (sms)
|
|
Filing 12
Exhibit to #11 Motion by SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.. (RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD) Modified on 6/9/2022 (qa, ).
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 7/5/2022 before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (qa, )
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Attachment #1) submitted by Clifford Ramundo on 6/8/2022 contains an improper signature. Only Registered Users are permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH A PROPER SCANNED SIGNATURE using the event "Exhibit(to Document)" found under Civil-Other Filings-Other Documents. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Dec of HBernstein, #2 Declaration Dec of CJRamundo, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order)(RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order, submitted by ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 6/23/2022. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by JACOB FRUMKIN on behalf of ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP (FRUMKIN, JACOB)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by ARNOLD PAUL PICINICH, III on behalf of ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP (PICINICH, ARNOLD)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has properly pleaded its citizenship upon review of plaintiff's response filed on May 20, 2022 (ECF No. #5 ) to the Court's jurisdictional inquiry dated May 16, 2022 (ECF No. 3). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 6/6/2022. (sms)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by LEO V. LEYVA on behalf of ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP (LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 6
Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants. Attorney LEO V. LEYVA for ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION,LEO V. LEYVA for ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC,LEO V. LEYVA for ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP added. (LEYVA, LEO)
|
|
Filing 5
AFFIDAVIT of Jeffrey Wolfer re 3 Order,,, by SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.. (RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by SILVER ARCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.. (RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER: This case was initiated under diversity jurisdiction. The citizenship information provided as to plaintiff Silver Arch Capital Partners, LLC (SALLC), which is alleged to be a limited liability company, is insufficient to determine SALLC's citizenship for the purposes of diversity. SALLC is ordered to file by May 23, 2022, a declaration completely analyzing its own citizenship with specificity in a manner that complies with the Court's standing order concerning unincorporated business organizations. By that same date, SALLC is also directed to properly allege the citizenship of each defendant in accordance with the Court's standing order, 28 U.S.C. Section 1332(a), and 28 U.S.C. Section 1332(c)(1). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 5/16/2022. (sms)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to ROMSPEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE GP INC, ROMSPEN US MORTGAGE LP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13402956) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SILVER ARCH CAPTIAL PARTNERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A, #2 Exhibit Exh B)(RAMUNDO, CLIFFORD)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
