WILKINS et al v. PATERSON et al
JEREL WILKINS, NAJEERA YOUNG, DANIELLE GOODWIN, ZELINDA YOUNG and O.Y. (a minor) |
PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER NIGEL BURGESS, OFFICER M. LUCERO, JOHN AND JANE DOES, POLICE OFFICER NIGEL BURGESS, POLICE OFFICER M. LUCERO and PATERSON POLICE OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 |
2:2022cv03293 |
May 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Hammer |
Julien Xavier Neals |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND separate defenses, ANSWER to Crossclaim , CROSSCLAIM against All Defendants by M. LUCERO.(MIKLACKI, JOEL) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2022 at 3:30 p.m. The parties will dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 9/8/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 7/14/2022. (jqb, ) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against NIGEL BURGESS, M. LUCERO, PATERSON POLICE OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 by PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT.(MURPHY, KEITH) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by IZIK GUTKIN on behalf of PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT (GUTKIN, IZIK) |
Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Amended Complaint.. (MURPHY, KEITH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by KEITH JAMES MURPHY on behalf of PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT (MURPHY, KEITH) |
Clerk's Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/11/2022. (dam) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DANIELLE GOODWIN, NAJEERA YOUNG, JEREL WILKINS, ZELINDA YOUNG. NIGEL BURGESS served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; M. LUCERO served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; PATERSON served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022; PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit)(SILBERMAN, JOEL) |
Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, by All Plaintiffs. (SILBERMAN, JOEL) Modified on 6/6/2022 (dam, ). |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to NIGEL BURGESS, M. LUCERO, PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ams, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against POLICE OFFICER NIGEL BURGESS, PATERSON POLICE OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, POLICE OFFICER M. LUCERO, PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13448963) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DANIELLE GOODWIN, NAJEERA YOUNG, JEREL WILKINS, ZELINDA YOUNG, O.Y. (a minor).(SILBERMAN, JOEL) Modified on 6/1/2022 (ams, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.