THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS v. PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C.
THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS |
PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C. |
2:2022cv03825 |
June 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
John Michael Vazquez |
Leda D Wettre |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Support filed by PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C. re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (LOCKETT, MARK) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JEFFREY I. WASSERMAN IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 (Complaint), #3 Exhibit Ex. 2 (Purchase Orders))(WASSERMAN, JEFFREY) |
Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 8/1/2022 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Filing 4 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion filed by THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (WASSERMAN, JEFFREY) |
Filing 3 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 8/22/2022 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 6/23/22. (LM, ) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 7/18/2022 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C.. Responses due by 7/5/2022 (Attachments: #1 Brief)(LOCKETT, MARK) |
Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C. from BERGEN, case number BER-L-002425-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13484566), filed by PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LOCKETT, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS v. PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: THE CARRINGTON TEA COMPANY D/B/A CARRINGTON FARMS | |
Represented By: | JEFFREY IAN WASSERMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PRETIUM PACKING L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | MARK A. LOCKETT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.