LY BERDITCHEV CORP. v. TRUSS COSMETICS CORP. et al
| LY BERDITCHEV CORP. |
| TRUSS COSMETICS CORP. and LOMA LICENCIAMENTO DE MARCAS LTDA |
| 2:2022cv04242 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to LOMA LICENCIAMENTO DE MARCAS LTDA, TRUSS COSMETICS CORP.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (adc, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by LY BERDITCHEV CORP. (adc, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against LOMA LICENCIAMENTO DE MARCAS LTDA, TRUSS COSMETICS CORP. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number NEW046818) with JURY DEMAND, filed by LY BERDITCHEV CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(adc, )NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
