ACKAWAY et al v. BANK OF AMERICA
| STEVEN ACKAWAY and LEIGH STREET REALTY, LLC |
| BANK OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE I AND JOHN DOE II |
| 2:2022cv04349 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
LETTER ORDER Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1. On 9/13/2022 at 10:30 AM there shall be an Initial Scheduling Conference before Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 8/4/2022. (smf) (Main Document 9 replaced on 8/4/2022) (smf).
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Letter requesting an extension through and including 9/2/2022, for BANK OF AMERICA to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 8/3/2022. (wh)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Michael E. Blaine. (BLAINE, MICHAEL) |
| Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #7 Letter, submitted by BANK OF AMERICA has been GRANTED per #8 Letter Order. The answer due date has been reset for 9/2/2022. (wh) |
|
Filing 6
LETTER ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Letter requesting an extension through and including 8/4/2022, for BANK OF AMERICA to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 7/20/2022. (wh)
|
| Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #5 Letter Request for Extension, submitted by BANK OF AMERICA has been GRANTED per #6 Letter Order. The answer due date has been reset for 8/4/2022. (wh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #5 Letter Request for Extension filed by M. BLAINE on 7/19/2022 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. For future reference, if filing a Letter Request that is not in the form of a Motion, please refer to the event "Letter". This is for informational purposes only, the appropriate changes have been made by the Clerk's Office, and no further actions/corrections are required at this time. (wh) |
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BANK OF AMERICA. (BLAINE, MICHAEL) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by BANK OF AMERICA has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/21/2022. (wh) |
| Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to time to answer or otherwise respond to complaint. Attorney MICHAEL E. BLAINE for BANK OF AMERICA added. (BLAINE, MICHAEL) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (ak, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BANK OF AMERICA identifying BAC North America Holding Company, NB Holdings Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as Corporate Parents. (BLAINE, MICHAEL) Modified on 7/5/2022 (wh). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL E. BLAINE on behalf of BANK OF AMERICA (BLAINE, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BANK OF AMERICA from Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County Civil Division, case number BER-L-2892-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13529307), filed by BANK OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(BLAINE, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
