JOHNSON v. KUHN et al
| WENDELL JOHNSON |
| VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., DAVID RICHARDS, T. CORTES, KENVA COLLINS and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL DEPARTMENT |
| 2:2022cv04453 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER Granting #1 -1 Plaintiff's IFP Application. The Clerk of the Court shall file the Complaint. Summons SHALL NOT ISSUE at this time because the Court's sua sponte screening has not yet been completed. The time to serve process under FRCP 4(m) is hereby extended to the date 90 days after the Court permits the Complaint to proceed. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 7/18/2022. (dam)
|
|
#2 Order mailed to Plaintiff, the U.S. Attorney's Office, the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and the Warden of the N.J. State Prison. (dam)
|
|
COMPLAINT, see D.E. #1 , against KENVA COLLINS, T. CORTES, VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, DAVID RICHARDS with JURY DEMAND, filed by WENDELL JOHNSON.(dam)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(pnm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
