VILLAFANA v. MORGAN et al
YASIN VILLAFANA |
JOSEPH J. MORGAN, LT. BELL, STG. COOPER, STG. MATOS, STG. SMITH, OFFICER FERRELL, OFFICER QUINONES, HEARING OFFICER and KERRY MCCANN |
2:2022cv04454 |
July 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
John Michael Vazquez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from YASIN VILLAFANA. (jd, ) |
***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (jd, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Pro Bono without Prejudice as moot. The Clerk of the Court Shall Administratively Terminated this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; and the Clerk of the Court shall provide the Plaintiff with a blank application to proceed in forma paurperis. The Plaintiff's has thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to submit a complete IFP application or the filing and administrative fee. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail. (n.m.). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 8/2/2022. (jd, ) |
Filing 5 Letter from YASIN VILLAFANA. (jd, ) |
Filing 4 Letter from YASIN VILLAFANA. (jd, ) |
Filing 3 Letter from YASIN VILLAFANA. (jd, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by YASIN VILLAFANA. (krg) |
Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope) (krg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.