HOGAN v. PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL et al
| CORTNEY HOGAN |
| PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL and ILA LOCAL 1235 |
| 2:2022cv04552 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: The Court will hold an initial conference (rule 16) before U.S.M.J. C. Waldor by telephone on 9/26/22 at 10am. Parties are to use the Courts teleconference dial-in: 888-808-6929 and Access Code is 9464201. Local counsel for any/all parties must participate. Parties are to submit a completed Pretrial Scheduling Order (for Judge Salas cases, please use her dedicated PTSO found in the same location) found in the Notice of Judicial Preferences link to chambers via email at CLW_Orders@njd.uscourts.gov no later than 3 days before the scheduled conference.. Please contact chambers with any questions or concerns at (973) 776 7862. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 8/18/22. (tjg, )
|
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tjg, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted by PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL. Responses due by 9/6/2022 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(AVALLONE, VINCENT) |
| Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Motion set for 9/19/2022 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
| Filing 6 Letter from CORTNEY HOGAN. (jd, ) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/18/2022. (lag, ) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Port Newark Container Terminal LLC.. (AVALLONE, VINCENT) |
| Filing 4 Letter from CORTNEY HOGAN. (sm) |
|
Filing 3
LETTER ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for a TRO #1 is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants pursuant to the federal and local civil rules. Plaintiff may amend his Complaint to the extent permitted by the Rules and properly file a motion for preliminary injunction to the extent he can articulate claims against Defendants that would warrant such extraordinary relief. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 7/14/2022. (sm)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL, ILA LOCAL 1235. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (krg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PORT NEWARK CONTAINER TERMINAL, ILA LOCAL 1235 ( Filing and Admin fee $402 receipt number NEW046896), filed by CORTNEY HOGAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Consent to Receive NEFs, #3 Notice of Motion, #4 Certificate of Service) (krg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
