THE SHOE INN v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY
| THE SHOE INN |
| MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2022cv04563 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 9/29/2022 at 11:30 a.m. The parties will dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 9/26/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 8/19/2022. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 8 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by THE SHOE INN. (CUMMINS, HARRY) |
| Filing 7 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY. (ZAGHA, JONATHAN) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY.(O'LEARY, JEREMIAH) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company.. (O'LEARY, JEREMIAH) |
| Clerk's Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/4/2022. (dam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN M. ZAGHA on behalf of MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY (ZAGHA, JONATHAN) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by EDWARD TERRENCE HAGAN on behalf of MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY (HAGAN, EDWARD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY identifying THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. as Corporate Parent.. (O'LEARY, JEREMIAH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY from Bergen County Superior Court, case number BER-L-3122-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13557419), filed by MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'LEARY, JEREMIAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: THE SHOE INN v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: THE SHOE INN | |
| Represented By: | HARRY A. CUMMINS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | JEREMIAH L. O'LEARY |
| Represented By: | EDWARD TERRENCE HAGAN |
| Represented By: | JONATHAN M. ZAGHA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
