BARGE et al v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD et al
| RANDALL BARGE, RICHELE BARGE, DANIEL COURNEY, TABITHA PARKER, ROBERT PARKER, LYDIA ORTIZ and KOMBE SEFELINO |
| CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COUNCIL, ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAWRENCE SUFFERN, THOMAS LOSCHIAVO, OFFICER CALDERIN, DETECTIVE J MORENO and JOHN DOES 1-10 OF THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 2:2022cv05181 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to OFFICER CALDERIN, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COUNCIL, ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS LOSCHIAVO, DETECTIVE J MORENO, LAWRENCE SUFFERN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13647464) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RANDALL BARGE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for City of Englewood, #3 Summons Summons for Englewood PD)(STRATIS, DEMETRIOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
