AME, INC. v. T.R. RICOTTA ELECTRIC, INC. et al
Plaintiff: AME, INC.
Defendant: T.R. RICOTTA ELECTRIC, INC., THOMAS RICOTTA, HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Case Number: 2:2022cv05211
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Evelyn Padin
Referring Judge: Cathy L Waldor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFICATION in Opposition filed by AME, INC. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Certificate of Service)(KEPPLER, STEVEN)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by AME, INC. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint (KEPPLER, STEVEN)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: The Court will hold an initial conference (rule 16) before U.S.M.J. C. Waldor by telephone on 11/2/22 at 10am. Parties are to use the Courts teleconference dial-in: 888-808-6929 and Access Code is 9464201. Local counsel for any/all parties must participate. Parties are to submit a completed Pretrial Scheduling Order (for Judge Salas cases, please use her dedicated PTSO found in the same location) found in the Notice of Judicial Preferences link to chambers via email at CLW_Orders@njd.uscourts.gov no later than 3 days before the scheduled conference.. Please contact chambers with any questions or concerns at (973) 776 7862. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 10/6/22. (tjg, )
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tjg, )
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. Motion set for 11/7/2022 before Judge Evelyn Padin. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Michael Goeller, #3 Exhibit A to Goeller Declaration, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(CAMINITI, MATTHEW)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by STEVEN TODD KEPPLER on behalf of AME, INC. (KEPPLER, STEVEN)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint by HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.. (CAMINITI, MATTHEW)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC., THOMAS RICOTTA, T.R. RICOTTA ELECTRIC, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.. (CAMINITI, MATTHEW)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIC R. BRESLIN on behalf of HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. (BRESLIN, ERIC)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (ak, )
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, case number ESX-L-004647-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13649963), filed by HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B)(CAMINITI, MATTHEW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AME, INC. v. T.R. RICOTTA ELECTRIC, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AME, INC.
Represented By: LEE MICHAEL TESSER
Represented By: STEVEN TODD KEPPLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T.R. RICOTTA ELECTRIC, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS RICOTTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HATZEL & BUEHLER, INC.
Represented By: MATTHEW CAMINITI
Represented By: ERIC R. BRESLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?