1200 W ELIZ LLC v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
1200 W ELIZ LLC |
OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2022cv05440 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #7 CERTIFICATION filed by 1200 W ELIZ LLC on 10/13/2022 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. The Clerk's Office has made the necessary changes and no further action is needed. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (mxw) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATION of Counsel for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by 1200 W ELIZ LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(BERGWALL, THOMAS) Modified on 10/14/2022 (mxw, ). |
Filing 6 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. (COSSOLINI, ROBERT) |
Filing 5 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/22/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/30/2022. (seb) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Ohio Security's Answer, #2 Exhibit B to Ohio Security's Answer)(COSSOLINI, ROBERT) |
Clerk's Text Order - The #3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer submitted by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY on 9/8/2022 has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/28/2022. (mxw) |
Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company.. (COSSOLINI, ROBERT) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY identifying LIBERTY MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY INC. as Corporate Parent.. (COSSOLINI, ROBERT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY from Union County Superior Court, case number UNN-L-002185-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13674697), filed by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(COSSOLINI, ROBERT) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: 1200 W ELIZ LLC v. OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: 1200 W ELIZ LLC | |
Represented By: | THOMAS P. BERGWALL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | ROBERT F. COSSOLINI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.