NEAL v. AVILES et al
Plaintiff: RODNEY NEAL
Defendant: OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Case Number: 2:2022cv05574
Filed: September 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: James B Clark
Referring Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting #3 Application to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915; furthermore the Complaint shall be filed and the filing fee assessed. For purposes of account deduction only, the Clerk shall served a copy of this Order by regular mail upon the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and the Warden of HCCF; and the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon NEAL by regular U.S. mail. (n.m.). Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 11/3/2022. (jd, )
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order COMPLAINT, see #1 against OSCAR AVILES, NURSE WINT, filed by RODNEY NEAL. (IFP Granted) (jd, ) Modified on 11/3/2022 (jd, ).
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order A copy of the #4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER were sent by regular U.S. mail to the Plaintiff, the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and the Warden of HCCF. (jd,)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 APPLICATION to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS by RODNEY NEAL. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope)(jd, )
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying #1 -1 Application to proceed in forma pauperis without Prejudice; and that the Clerk of the Court shall Administratively Terminate this case without filing the Complaint or assessing a filing fee. This is not a dismissal for purposes of the statute of limitations. If Neal wishes to reopen this case, he shall notify the Court, in writing within 45 days of the date of entry of this Order. Upon receipt of a written response from Neal stating that he wishes to reopen this case, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and the Clerk of the Court shall served a copy of this Order and a blank IFP application upon Neal by regular U.S. mail (n.m.). Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/3/2022. (jd, )
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (jd, )
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope)(adc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEAL v. AVILES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODNEY NEAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OSCAR AVILES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NURSE WINT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?