REEVES v. WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED et al
| RODNEY REEVES |
| WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED and JOHN DOES 1-10 (a fictitious name for any person, firms, corporations and municipalities presently known) |
| 2:2022cv05768 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney FLOYD G. COTTRELL terminated. Attorney MICHAEL J BISHOP for WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED added.. (BISHOP, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 4 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED. (COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED identifying Walmart Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED from Essex County Superior Court, case number ESX-L-4974-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13721834), filed by WAL-MART STORES INCORPORATED.(COTTRELL, FLOYD) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
