GRAY v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
| NATASHA GRAY |
| PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC |
| 2:2022cv05850 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (nic, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal was filed by NATASHA GRAY (JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.. (STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN)NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court. |
| Clerk's Text Order - The #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order,, submitted by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/25/2022. (mxw) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates has restricted access to the #3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer filed on 10/06/2022 without an order or clarification as to why access was restricted. Please submit a certification stating that this document is to be marked Confidential Material or that this document's access was restricted in error. Please be advised, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3, you must file a motion for leave to have a document sealed. (mxw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC identifying PRA Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC from Superior Court of Bergen County New Jersey, case number BER-DC-008826-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13731766), filed by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRAY v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATASHA GRAY | |
| Represented By: | JOSEPH K. JONES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC | |
| Represented By: | STEPHEN STEINLIGHT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
