ROBINHOOD PLAZA, INC. et al v. HKSHANGHI LLC et al
| ROBINHOOD PLAZA, INC., INTERNATIONAL CHAIN ENRICO CORP. and AVNER NETTER |
| HKSHANGHI LLC, HAP INVESTMENTS LLC, 500 SUMMIT AVENUE MAZAL LLC, AMIR HASID, NIR AMSEL and ERAN POLLACK |
| 2:2022cv06110 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to 500 SUMMIT AVENUE MAZAL LLC, NIR AMSEL, HAP INVESTMENTS LLC, AMIR HASID, HKSHANGHI LLC, ERAN POLLACK. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mxw, ) |
| Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by INTERNATIONAL CHAIN ENRICO CORP.. (PRIBISH, JOHN) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROBINHOOD PLAZA, INC.. (PRIBISH, JOHN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 500 SUMMIT AVENUE MAZAL LLC, NIR AMSEL, HAP INVESTMENTS LLC, AMIR HASID, HKSHANGHI LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13763205) with JURY DEMAND, filed by AVNER NETTER, INTERNATIONAL CHAIN ENRICO CORP., ROBINHOOD PLAZA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PRIBISH, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
