BUSHANSKY v. PBF LOGISTICS LP et al
| STEPHEN BUSHANSKY |
| PBF LOGISTICS LP, THOMAS J. NIMBLEY, MATTHEW C. LUCEY, C. ERIK YOUNG, MICHAEL D. GAYDA, BRUCE A. JONES, DAVID ROUSH and LAWRENCE ZIEMBA |
| 2:2022cv06185 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BRUCE A. JONES, C. ERIK YOUNG, DAVID ROUSH, LAWRENCE ZIEMBA, MATTHEW C. LUCEY, MICHAEL D. GAYDA, PBF LOGISTICS LP, THOMAS J. NIMBLEY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRUCE A. JONES, C. ERIK YOUNG, DAVID ROUSH, LAWRENCE ZIEMBA, MATTHEW C. LUCEY, MICHAEL D. GAYDA, PBF LOGISTICS LP, THOMAS J. NIMBLEY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13772238) with JURY DEMAND, filed by STEPHEN BUSHANSKY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Addendum to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons # 1, #4 Summons Summons #2, #5 Summons Summons #3, #6 Summons Summons #4, #7 Summons Summons #5, #8 Summons Summons #6, #9 Summons Summons #7, #10 Summons Summons #8)(SMILOW, MARK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
