DOE v. L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
| JANE DOE |
| L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN |
| 2:2022cv06197 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; that Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint is hereby extended from December 2, 2022 to December 23, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen on 12/5/2022. (ld, )
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Order Extending Time to Answer, With Consent by L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN re #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order. (WRIGHT, KERRI) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/2/2022. (ld, ) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant. Attorney KERRI ANN WRIGHT for L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN added. (WRIGHT, KERRI) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN served on 10/28/2022, answer due 11/18/2022. (MILUN, RYAN) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint, QC - Civil Cover Sheet JS44,, by JANE DOE. (MILUN, RYAN) |
| Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen added. (ps) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13773106) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JANE DOE.(MILUN, RYAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DOE v. L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JANE DOE | |
| Represented By: | RYAN MILUN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: L BRANDS, INC. WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN | |
| Represented By: | KERRI ANN WRIGHT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
