DIKILI v. USCIS et al
| ALI DIKILI |
| USCIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, JENNIFER HIGGINS, ANDREW DAVIDSON, MATTHEW D. EMRICH and SUSAN RAUFER |
| 2:2022cv06273 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANDREW DAVIDSON, MATTHEW D. EMRICH, JENNIFER HIGGINS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, SUSAN RAUFER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, USCIS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (dam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, JENNIFER HIGGINS, ANDREW DAVIDSON, MATTHEW D. EMRICH, SUSAN RAUFER (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13784436), filed by ALI DIKILI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44, #2 Exhibit Notice of Appearance, #3 Affidavit Plaintiff's Declaration, #4 Exhibit I-589 Receipt, #5 Exhibit Shortlist Request) (KUNDANMAL, NITA) Modified on 10/26/2022 (dam). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Evelyn Padin. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
