KO v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
EUNBIN KO |
HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH and JOHN DOE |
2:2022cv06335 |
October 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Leda D Wettre |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/1/2023 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 12/22/22. (LM, ) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants.(LEE, DIANE) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by DIANE H. LEE on behalf of All Defendants (LEE, DIANE) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by EUNBIN KO. HANAM DAEJI, INC served on 11/5/2022, answer due 11/28/2022; KANG W LEE served on 11/5/2022, answer due 11/28/2022. (KIM, RYAN) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint, Consent to Sue by EUNBIN KO. (KIM, RYAN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE, HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13792178) with JURY DEMAND, filed by EUNBIN KO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(KIM, RYAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.