HOUSER et al v. POWERDOT, INC. et al
ROBERT T HOUSER and NEUROBRIDGE, LLC |
POWERDOT, INC. and THERABODY, INC. |
2:2022cv06385 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Kevin McNulty |
Leda D Wettre |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre: Status Conference held on 11/9/2022. (LM, ) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by All Defendants (STOEHR, STEVEN) |
|
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-13798050.), filed by THERABODY, INC., POWERDOT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Tyler M. Paetkau in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(STOEHR, STEVEN) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-13798050.). Motion set for 12/5/2022 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.