CLASEN v. HON. JUDGE MARGARET M. MARTEY J.S.C. et al
| HECTOR LUIS CLASEN |
| HON. JUDGE MARGARET M. MARTEY J.S.C., HUDSON COUNTY FAMILY COURT, STATE DIVISION COUNSEL and AUTUMN KNICELY - QUITO DAG |
| 2:2022cv06786 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER: As to plaintiff's letter request to appoint pro bono counsel filed on December 22, 2021 (ECF No. #2 ), only parties permitted to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 may seek such relief. See Fulton v. United States, 198 F.App'x 210, 214 (3d Cir. 2006) (finding no error in denying request for appointment of counsel where plaintiff "had not received [in forma pauperis] status"). Accordingly, the request is denied without prejudice, with leave to plaintiff to file a proper motion for such relief if the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1-1) is resolved favorably and the complaint proceeds after screening. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/26/2022. (sms)
|
| Filing 2 Letter request for Counsel from HECTOR LUIS CLASEN. (ld)(n/m) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope)(adc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
