GOZEL v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| IHSAN GOZEL |
| USCIS, DHS, ANDREW DAVIDSON, MATTHEW D. EMRICH, JENNIFER HIGGINS, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SUSAN RAUFER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, USCIS FRAUD DETECTION AND NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTORATE, NEW JERSEY ASYLUM OFFICE and USCIS REFUGEE, ASYLUM AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS |
| 2:2022cv07095 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANDREW DAVIDSON, DHS, MATTHEW D. EMRICH, JENNIFER HIGGINS, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SUSAN RAUFER, USCIS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mxw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW DAVIDSON, DHS, MATTHEW D. EMRICH, JENNIFER HIGGINS, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SUSAN RAUFER, USCIS ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13879464), filed by ihsan gozel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44, #2 Exhibit Notice of Appearance, #3 Exhibit I-589 Receipt)(KUNDANMAL, NITA) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
