HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OZ MOVING & STORAGE, INC. et al
| HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY ASO CHET STOJANOVICH and HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| OZ MOVING & STORAGE, INC., LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-5 |
| 2:2022cv07146 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 2/21/2023. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 12/22/2022. (wh)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Michael Savett, Esquire. (SAVETT, MICHAEL) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: At defendant Lemonade Insurance Company's counsel's request, the time to file the declarations referenced in the Court's order dated December 12, 2022 (ECF No. 3) is extended from December 19, 2022 to December 28, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/12/22. (bms)
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER: Citizenship has not been properly alleged in this action removed under diversity jurisdiction. By December 19, 2022, declarations are ordered to be filed by: (1) plaintiff Homesite Insurance Company (Homesite) declaring whether direct relief is sought for Chet Stojanovich, and whether his citizenship must be pleaded; (2) Homesite and defendant Lemonade Insurance Company (Lemonade) declaring the nature of their organizations, and then completely analyzing their respective citizenships in compliance with either the # standing order if they are unincorporated business organizations or 28 U.S.C. (Section) 1332(c)(1) if they are corporations; and (3) Lemonade declaring defendant Oz Moving & Storage, Inc.'s (Oz) complete citizenship under Section 1332(c)(1). Also, Homesite is advised that: (1) Oz was served and has answered in state court; and (2) the action may have been removed in violation of the forum-defendant bar, see Section 1441(b)(2), and the rule of unanimity, see First Am. Title Ins. Corp. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 384 F.App'x 64, 66 (3d Cir. 2010). Therefore, Homesite is directed to file by January 9, 2023, either a motion to remand or a stipulation to remand with defendants, if appropriate. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/12/22. (bms)
|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 1/13/2023. (qa, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting the #2 Application for an Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/9/2022. (qa, )
|
| Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Lemonade Insurance Company.. (SAVETT, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY from NJ Superior Law Division Union County, case number 2993-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13882778), filed by LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SAVETT, MICHAEL) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
