MARMOL v. VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: CARLOS MARMOL
Defendant: Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc., RONALD L. SMITH, EAN HOLDINGS, ELRAC INC. doing business as ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CO. 1-10
Cross Claimant: Clerac, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv07395
Filed: December 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Evelyn Padin
Referring Judge: Leda D Wettre
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Clerac, LLC. (AQUINO, HEATHER)
February 16, 2023 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against RONALD L. SMITH, VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. by Clerac, LLC.(AQUINO, HEATHER)
February 2, 2023 Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Clerac, LLC, EAN HOLDINGS, ELRAC INC.. (AQUINO, HEATHER)
February 2, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by HEATHER AQUINO on behalf of EAN HOLDINGS, ELRAC INC., Clerac, LLC (AQUINO, HEATHER)
February 2, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #13 6.1 application entered by HEATHER AQUINO was submitted incorrectly as a motion. The motion will be terminated, and the 6.1 application will be considered - such as it is - by the court. Additionally this submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. For future filings of this nature, please select the event "Application for Clerk order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order" located in the Other Documents menu. This message is for informational purposes only. (lag, )
February 2, 2023 Clerk`s Text Order - #13 Application 6.1 submitted by Clerac, LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/16/2023. (lag, )
January 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 3/13/2023 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 1/25/23. (LM, )
January 24, 2023 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by RONALD L. SMITH.(MEHTA, CHARU)
January 20, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by ANTHONY M. PISCIOTTI on behalf of RONALD L. SMITH, VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. (PISCIOTTI, ANTHONY)
January 11, 2023 Clerk`s Text Order - The #7 6.1 Application submitted by RONALD L. SMITH has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 1/24/2023. (lag, )
January 11, 2023 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #7 6.1 application filed by CHARU MEHTA on 1/10/2023 was submitted incorrectly as a motion. the motion will be terminated, and the 6.1 application will be considered - such as it is - by the court. Additionally, this submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (lag, )
January 10, 2023 Filing 8 Letter from Plaintiff in Response to Defendant's Request for a Pre-Motion Conference. (LABARBIERA, RICHARD)
January 10, 2023 Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Proposed Order by RONALD L. SMITH. (MEHTA, CHARU)
January 10, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by CHARU MEHTA on behalf of RONALD L. SMITH, VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. (MEHTA, CHARU)
January 9, 2023 Filing 5 Letter from Defendants Velocity Rail Solutions and A. Stucki Company for a Pre-Motion Conference. (ERDREICH, RYAN)
December 27, 2022 Clerk`s Text Order - The document submitted by VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC., RONALD L. SMITH has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 1/9/2023. (lag, )
December 26, 2022 Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc. and A. Stucki Company.. (ERDREICH, RYAN)
December 20, 2022 Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, by VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.. (ERDREICH, RYAN)
December 20, 2022 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ps)
December 20, 2022 Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps)
December 19, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc. identifying A. Stucki Company as Corporate Parent.. (ERDREICH, RYAN)
December 19, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County, case number Hud-L-3792-22. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13906770), filed by Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A, Complaint, #3 Exhibit B, First Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit C, All Filed Dockets, #5 Exhibit D, Service, #6 Exhibit E, Docket Sheet)(ERDREICH, RYAN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARMOL v. VELOCITY RAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Velocity Rail Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: RYAN LAWRENCE ERDREICH
Represented By: CHARU MEHTA
Represented By: ANTHONY M. PISCIOTTI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RONALD L. SMITH
Represented By: CHARU MEHTA
Represented By: ANTHONY M. PISCIOTTI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EAN HOLDINGS, ELRAC INC. doing business as ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
Represented By: HEATHER AQUINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC CO. 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARLOS MARMOL
Represented By: RICHARD LABARBIERA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross claimant: Clerac, LLC
Represented By: HEATHER AQUINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?