ABURADWAN v. WERTZ
| MAHMOUD ABURADWAN |
| JAMES J. WERTZ, arbnwk and PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. |
| 2:2022cv07409 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND against PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., filed by MAHMOUD ABURADWAN.(PISANO, JOHN) |
Filing 3
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint properly alleging the citizenship of every party and alleging that diversity of citizenship exists between Plaintiff and Defendant or properly plead an alternative basis for jurisdiction no later than 1/12/2023. Failure to comply with this Order may result in this Court dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 12/22/2022. (wh)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JAMES J. WERTZ. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES J. WERTZ ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13908178) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MAHMOUD ABURADWAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44)(PISANO, JOHN) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
