MUSTU v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| GULNUR MUSTU |
| U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and JOHN E. THOMPSON |
| 2:2022cv07611 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 2/8/2023. (sm)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION of Dismissal by GULNUR MUSTU. (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN E. THOMPSON, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN E. THOMPSON, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13928310), filed by GULNUR MUSTU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons as to Ur M. Jaddou, #4 Summons as to John E. Thompson, #5 Summons as to USCIS)(HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
| Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
