GUERRERO LOPEZ et al v. BLINKEN et al
ANA O GUERRERO LOPEZ and OSCAR L JARAMILLO |
SEC DHS ANTHONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, PAULO CORREIA, JOHN THOMPSON and PHILIP R SELLINGER |
2:2023cv00082 |
January 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Esther Salas |
Cathy L Waldor |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 2/24/2023. (dam) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ANA O GUERRERO LOPEZ, OSCAR L JARAMILLO (VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ANTHONY BLINKEN, PAULO CORREIA, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTHONY BLINKEN, PAULO CORREIA, MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAJORKAS, PHILIP R SELLINGER, JOHN THOMPSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13943273), filed by OSCAR L JARAMILLO, ANA O GUERRERO LOPEZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(VOSBIKIAN, STEVEN) |
Case assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.