INGRAO v. MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN
ISAAC PEDRINI INGRAO |
MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, JOHN DOE (1-100) and XYZ CORP. (1-100) |
2:2023cv00151 |
January 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jose R Almonte |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL E. HOLZAPFEL on behalf of MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN (HOLZAPFEL, MICHAEL) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by POOJA BHUTANI on behalf of MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN (BHUTANI, POOJA) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ISAAC PEDRINI INGRAO. MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN waiver sent on 2/8/2023, answer due 4/10/2023. (HALKOVICH, JEFFREY) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAQUARIE HOLDINGS (USA), INC. WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, JOHN DOE (1-100), XYZ CORP. (1-100) ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number 47687), filed by ISAAC PEDRINI INGRAO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jr) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.