SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
CARMEN A. SANCHEZ |
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious names), JANE ROES 1-10 (fictitious names) and ABC COMPANIES, INC. 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) |
2:2023cv01011 |
February 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jose R Almonte |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14066068) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CARMEN A. SANCHEZ.(ARZADI, KARIM) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (jr) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.