LEWANDOWSKI v. TAL EDUCATION GROUP et al
| JORDAN LEWANDOWSKI |
| TAL EDUCATION GROUP and BANGXIN ZHANG |
| 2:2023cv01769 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose R Almonte |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael E Farbiarz |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Michael E. Farbiarz for all further proceedings. Judge Madeline Cox Arleo no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 5/24/23. (ak, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TAL EDUCATION GROUP, BANGXIN ZHANG. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (wh) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (ak, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JORDAN LEWANDOWSKI. (ROSEN, LAURENCE) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by JORDAN LEWANDOWSKI as to TAL EDUCATION GROUP, BANGXIN ZHANG. (ROSEN, LAURENCE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TAL EDUCATION GROUP, BANGXIN ZHANG ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14205737) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JORDAN LEWANDOWSKI. (Attachments: #1 PSLRA Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ROSEN, LAURENCE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
