FILIPPATOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| JOHN FILIPPATOS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2023cv02033 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal Libel,Assault,Slander |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RESPONSE in Further Opposition filed by Plaintiff JOHN FILIPPATOS re #2 MOTION to Dismiss (Filing Received via the ECF Help Desk E-mail) (dam)
|
|
Filing 5
RESPONSE in Support filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA re #2 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction With Prejudice (DOYNE, BROOKS)
|
|
Filing 4
RESPONSE in Opposition filed by JOHN FILIPPATOS re #2 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction With Prejudice (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Email Reporting John Kessler to Stephen Fischer, #2 Exhibit - Email Reporting John Kessler to Postal Inspector, #3 Exhibit - SF-95 sent to John Kessler and Stephen Fischer, #4 Exhibit - Text Message reporting Stephen Fischer to John Kessler)(Filing Received via the ECF Help Desk E-mail) (dam)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER that if Plaintiff fails to respond to #2 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss by 5/18/2023, the Court will consider the Motion unopposed. Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiff's opposition is extended to seven (7) days from the filing of Plaintiff's opposition. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 5/4/2023. (dam)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #2 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Prejudice. Motion set for 5/15/2023 before Judge Brian R. Martinotti. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk's Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dam)
|
|
Filing 2
First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction With Prejudice by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Certification, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(DOYNE, BROOKS) Modified on 4/19/2023 (dam).
|
|
Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA from New Jersey Superior Court Union Vicinage, case number UNN-L-732-23., filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service)(DOYNE, BROOKS) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/13/2023) (dam, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FILIPPATOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN FILIPPATOS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | BROOKS E. DOYNE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
