MCKINNEY v. KRULLER, INC. et al
| NAECHA N. MCKINNEY |
| KRULLER, INC. doing business as DUNKIN DONUTS, SHYAM PATEL and BHAVIN GANDHI |
| 2:2023cv02110 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| William J Martini |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NAECHA N. MCKINNEY. SHYAM PATEL waiver sent on 4/14/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (SALAMAN, ROBERT) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NAECHA N. MCKINNEY. BHAVIN GANDHI waiver sent on 4/14/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (SALAMAN, ROBERT) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NAECHA N. MCKINNEY. KRULLER, INC. waiver sent on 4/14/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (SALAMAN, ROBERT) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BHAVIN GANDHI, KRULLER, INC., SHYAM PATEL. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mxw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bhavin Gandhi, Kruller, Inc., Shyam Patel ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14248653) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Naecha N. McKinney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(SALAMAN, ROBERT) |
| Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
