MEDTRONIC, INC. v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
MEDTRONIC, INC. |
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY |
2:2023cv02339 |
April 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Jose R Almonte |
William J Martini |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in DISTRICT OF KANSAS as case 2:23-cv-02261, filed 06/08/2023. (jjc) |
Case extracted via ECF to District of Kansas. (mfr) |
Filing 7 Order that Petitioner's Motion to Compel is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE the Motion pending at ECF No. #1 and mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 6/7/2023. (wh) |
***Civil Case Terminated. (wh) |
Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by MEDTRONIC, INC. re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas. (KLUGMAN, SCOTT) Modified on 5/31/2023 (wh). |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of PAUL A. MURPHY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte on 5/23/2023. (wh) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by MEDTRONIC, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott B. Klugman in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certification of Paul A. Murphy in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(KLUGMAN, SCOTT) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas. (HERMAN, DAVID) Modified on 5/23/2023 (wh). |
Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. (jr) |
Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas. Motion set for 6/5/2023 before Magistrate Judge Jose R. Almonte. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (wh) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MEDTRONIC, INC.. (KLUGMAN, SCOTT) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number ANJDC-14278876.), filed by MEDTRONIC, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Scott B. Klugman, #3 Exhibits A - J, #4 Local Rule 11.2 Certification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certificate of Service, #7 Proposed Order)(KLUGMAN, SCOTT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MEDTRONIC, INC. v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MEDTRONIC, INC. | |
Represented By: | SCOTT BRIAN KLUGMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY | |
Represented By: | DAVID FOSTER HERMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.