LONGO v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
| JOHN LONGO |
| FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, CHAIRWOMAN MELINDA N. COONROD, COMMISSIONER RICHARD DAVISON, COMMISSIONER DAVID WYANT, BERNARD F. DALEY, RICHARD L. ROSENBAUM and MICHAEL D. WEINSTEIN |
| 2:2023cv02841 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case extracted via ECF to Northern District of Florida. (mfr) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the complaint shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for Northern District of Florida, 28 U.S.C. 1631; that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff by regular mail and mark this case CLOSED. (n/m) Signed by Judge Evelyn Padin on 6/1/2023. (sm)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (adc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MELINDA N. COONROD, BERNARD F. DALEY, RICHARD DAVISON, FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, RICHARD L. ROSENBAUM, MICHAEL D. WEINSTEIN, DAVID WYANT ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number NEW48346), filed by JOHN LONGO. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Letter to Clerk Regarding Payment, #3 Application fo Pro Bono Counsel)(adc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
