RIVERA v. JAG PAVING CORP et al
| EDGAR RIVERA |
| JAG PAVING CORP, ERNESTINE REYES and LORENA LUGO |
| 2:2023cv04032 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Stanley R Chesler |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by LORENA LUGO, JAG PAVING CORP has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/8/2023. (lag, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants JAG Paving Corp. and Lorena Lugo. Attorney JARED JAMES LIMBACH for JAG PAVING CORP,JARED JAMES LIMBACH for LORENA LUGO added. (LIMBACH, JARED) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JAG PAVING CORP, LORENA LUGO, ERNESTINE REYES. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAG PAVING CORP, LORENA LUGO, ERNESTINE REYES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14488005) with JURY DEMAND, filed by EDGAR RIVERA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
