MANENTE v. COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION
VITO MANENTE |
COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION |
2:2023cv04033 |
July 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Claire C Cecchi |
James B Clark |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant NJ Division of Taxation filed by Plaintiff VITO MANENTE. Motion set for 10/16/2023 before Judge Claire C. Cecchi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk's Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (dam) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant NJ Division of Taxation filed by Plaintiff VITO MANENTE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Affidavit of Service as to NJ Division of Taxation, #2 Envelope)(dam) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury served via Certified Mail on 8/14/2023, filed by VITO MANENTE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dam) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service served on COMMISIONER OF NJ DIVISION OF TAXATION, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NJ, NJ DIVISION OF TAXATION on 7/28/2023, filed by VITO MANENTE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dam) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #4 Affidavit of Service submitted by VITO MANENTE on 8/11/2023 appears to have not been served properly pursuant to Federal Rule 4(c)(2) which states, any person who is at least 18 years old and not a party may serve the summons and complaint. The Affidavit of Service is also electronically signed (e.g., s/) by the Plaintiff in this matter. Only registered users and Attorneys may electronically sign documents. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This message is for informational purposes only. (dam) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sms2) |
Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (sms2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number NEW48729) with JURY DEMAND, filed by VITO MANENTE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 NEF Consent Form, #3 Envelope)(sms2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MANENTE v. COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: VITO MANENTE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: COMMISIONER OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.