ESSEX SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C. v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY et al
| ESSEX SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C. |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and ABC CORPS. |
| 2:2023cv04041 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| James B Clark |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 8/28/2023. (dam)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal Voluntary Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice by ESSEX SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C.. (KATZ, ERIC) |
|
Filing 8
CONSENT ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT AND TOLLING OF DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT that plaintiff shall file its motion no later than 9/5/2023; Defendants file their opposition no later than 10/5/2023; Plaintiff's reply by 10/26/2023 and the motion shall be returnable 11/6/2023; the date by which Defendants shall file their response(s) to Plaintiffs Complaint is tolled until thirty (30) days following disposition of Plaintiffs remand motion, and assuming this matter is not remanded. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 8/16/2023. (sm)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Eric D. Katz to Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo, U.S.D.J. attaching proposed Consent Order for Remand Motion Briefing Schedule re #1 Notice of Removal,,. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Order for Remand Motion Briefing Schedule)(KATZ, ERIC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID MICHAEL ESTES on behalf of ESSEX SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C. (ESTES, DAVID) |
| Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #5 submitted by UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/17/2023. (sm) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to The Proctor & Gamble Company and United Healthcare Services, Inc.. Attorney MATTHEW P. MAZZOLA for THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,MATTHEW P. MAZZOLA for UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. added. (MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (aty), #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (aty), #1 Notice of Removal,, (MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY identifying None as Corporate Parent.. (MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (ps) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. identifying UnitedHealth Group Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY from Superior Court, County of Essex, case number ESX-L-003874-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number CNJDC-14488390), filed by UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Filings, #3 Exhibit C-N.J. Dept. of Treasury-Status Report, #4 Exhibit D-Address Report, #5 Exhibit E-Business Records Detail-MN Secretary of State, #6 Exhibit F-Provider Remittance Advice Form, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAZZOLA, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
