EISELE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
| TARA EISELE and ESTATE OF MATTHEW EISELE |
| DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., 3M COMPANY, E.I DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, CHEMGUARD INC., BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, NATIONAL FOAM, INC., CORTEVA, INC., DOWDUPONT, INC., THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, KIDDIE-FENWAL, INC., BASF CORPORATION, AMEREX CORPORATION, DYNAX CORPORATION, CLARIANT CORPORATION, CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION and DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE |
| 2:2023cv04066 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Evelyn Padin |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in District of South Carolina as case 2:23-cv-04273, filed 08/25/2023. (jjc, ) |
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: The initial scheduling conference previously scheduled for October 2, 2023 (ECF No. #2 ) is canceled. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/28/2023. (sms)
|
|
Filing 5
Order of MDL Panel (CTO-149) transferring case to the District of South Carolina. (jjc, )
|
| Case electronically transferred to the USDC for the District of South Carolina. (jjc, ) |
|
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Re Ecf No. #3 : that the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Tara Eisele, in her Individual Capacity and as Executrix of The Estate of Matthew Eisele, and The Estate of Matthew Eisele on June 28, 2023, be and hereby is extended through and including the 28th day after a decision is made to remand this matter to State Court or to transfer this matter to the pending Multidistrict Litigation, whichever is earlier. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/9/2023. (ld, )
|
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party or intervenor. Please refer to the Court's website at #www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (dam) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint by CHEMGUARD INC., TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint) (HERTEN, THOMAS) Modified on 8/7/2023 (dam). |
|
Filing 2
LETTER ORDER: A telephonic initial scheduling conference shall be held on October 2, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The dial in number is 1-888-684-8852 and the access code is 310-0383#. The parties shall file a proposed joint discovery plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form joint discovery plan can be found # here. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/4/2023. (sms)
|
| Judge Evelyn Padin and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, CHEMGUARD INC. from Superior Court of Bergen County, case number BER-L-3366-23. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-14491330), filed by TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, CHEMGUARD INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service)(HERTEN, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
